I have heard from a number of sources that if our work and ministry engagements do not align at least 70% with our gifts and passions, it is not a good long-term fit. I believe there is a lot of wisdom in this statement.
Since I shifted from my 10 year role with ACMC into my role with Pioneers church partnerships team two years ago, I have been increasingly experiencing a lack of strong alignment. I love Pioneers, her mission, her core values, and her top leadership. But the fit I have with the team I serve on has been far less than a 70% alignment.
I am very grateful that Pioneers is supporting me as I seek to find a role that will better fit who God has uniquely made me to be. As I have reflected, sought input, and prayed deeply about this I have come to the conclusion that my gifting is primarily in four areas: teaching, consulting/coaching, writing, and administration. My passions lie primarily in six areas: adult education, discipleship, training workers, leadership development, developing ministry models and strategies, and church planting among the least reached.
I developed a life mission statement many years ago. It reads: “to honor God by serving as a model and catalyst to individuals and churches for reproductive engagement in the Great Commission locally and among the least reached.” This statement has served as a great benchmark for assessing opportunities that God brings into my life. It has been a huge help in determining whether I should pursue an opportunity or politely say no.
Rarely, if ever, does a job or volunteer opportunity provide a vehicle for us to engage 100% in our gifts and passions and also align well with our sense of life mission. But that 70% standard is an important one. It is one that is at the forefront of my thoughts and prayers as I seek out the next step God has for me in work and ministry.
How about you? Are you serving long-term in contexts that are a good fit for who God has uniquely made you to be?
Sunday, November 3, 2013
Sunday, October 6, 2013
from October 6, 2013 prayer update
Todd Johnson published an article titled “globalization, Christian identity, and frontier missions” in the Journal of Frontier Missiology in 2010. In it he discusses important trends with missions. One of those trends is that Christians have little significant contact with Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists.
The task remaining globally is predominantly among these three religious blocks. Sadly globally 86% of all Muslims, Hindus, and Buddhists do not know a single Christian. They have few, if no ways, of hearing the gospel and believing. Even in the U.S., 60% of ethnic non-Christians do not have a relationship with a single Christian. And 70% of Muslims, Hindus, and Buddhists.
According to J.D. Payne, in his recent book, Pressure Points: 12 Global Issues Shaping the Face of the Church. The U.S. is the largest immigrant nation in the world, with 43 million first generation legal immigrants (Russia is second with 13 million). There are nearly a million international students in the U.S. (with 194K from China, 100K from India, 70K from South Korea, 34K from Saudi Arabia). And there are 571 UPG (unreached people groups) in the U.S. and Canada. This is less than 10% of the UPG’s globally, but still not an inconsequential number. God has truly brought the nations to our doorstep.
There are also 51 million religiously unaffiliated individuals in the U.S. (third to China and Japan). And this number is rapidly growing. Thankfully well over 95% of these atheists and agnostics are in relationship with one or more Christians, and do have access to the gospel.
In last month’s personal reflections I shared about the Explore God campaign in my home of Austin. 370 Austin area churches working together to engage in spiritual conversations in low key ways with tens of thousands of Austinites. I heartily commend these efforts. Wouldn’t it be great if something like this happened in every major metropolitan area in the U.S. But even if it did, we fail to properly understand important components of the great commission if we focus most of our outreach energies of folks like ourselves. We must make ethnic communities and individuals from Muslim, Hindu, and Buddhist backgrounds a strategic priority.
I have been part of a multi-church, multi-generational missional community for 19 months. Our focus recently narrowed from engaging Austin area Muslims specifically to engaging Arabic speaking Muslims. Our objective is to see a rapidly reproducing Arabic speaking church planted in Austin. We are partnering with a Syrian pastor toward that end. We are a small missional community of a little more than a dozen and our impact to date is small. We saw two Arabic speaking couples come to Christ this summer. But our heart, our vision, and prayers are large.
Get out of your comfort zone. Engage the lost. And make special efforts to engage those with little or no access to the gospel. There are lots of ways to get started. If you’re not sure how to get started, let me know. I would be delighted to help point you to folks that can be a helpful resource.
The task remaining globally is predominantly among these three religious blocks. Sadly globally 86% of all Muslims, Hindus, and Buddhists do not know a single Christian. They have few, if no ways, of hearing the gospel and believing. Even in the U.S., 60% of ethnic non-Christians do not have a relationship with a single Christian. And 70% of Muslims, Hindus, and Buddhists.
According to J.D. Payne, in his recent book, Pressure Points: 12 Global Issues Shaping the Face of the Church. The U.S. is the largest immigrant nation in the world, with 43 million first generation legal immigrants (Russia is second with 13 million). There are nearly a million international students in the U.S. (with 194K from China, 100K from India, 70K from South Korea, 34K from Saudi Arabia). And there are 571 UPG (unreached people groups) in the U.S. and Canada. This is less than 10% of the UPG’s globally, but still not an inconsequential number. God has truly brought the nations to our doorstep.
There are also 51 million religiously unaffiliated individuals in the U.S. (third to China and Japan). And this number is rapidly growing. Thankfully well over 95% of these atheists and agnostics are in relationship with one or more Christians, and do have access to the gospel.
In last month’s personal reflections I shared about the Explore God campaign in my home of Austin. 370 Austin area churches working together to engage in spiritual conversations in low key ways with tens of thousands of Austinites. I heartily commend these efforts. Wouldn’t it be great if something like this happened in every major metropolitan area in the U.S. But even if it did, we fail to properly understand important components of the great commission if we focus most of our outreach energies of folks like ourselves. We must make ethnic communities and individuals from Muslim, Hindu, and Buddhist backgrounds a strategic priority.
I have been part of a multi-church, multi-generational missional community for 19 months. Our focus recently narrowed from engaging Austin area Muslims specifically to engaging Arabic speaking Muslims. Our objective is to see a rapidly reproducing Arabic speaking church planted in Austin. We are partnering with a Syrian pastor toward that end. We are a small missional community of a little more than a dozen and our impact to date is small. We saw two Arabic speaking couples come to Christ this summer. But our heart, our vision, and prayers are large.
Get out of your comfort zone. Engage the lost. And make special efforts to engage those with little or no access to the gospel. There are lots of ways to get started. If you’re not sure how to get started, let me know. I would be delighted to help point you to folks that can be a helpful resource.
Sunday, September 1, 2013
from September 1, 2013 prayer update
Explore God is a two month city-wide evangelism campaign my home church is participating in. My senior pastor has been a key player in vision casting and recruiting with 330 Austin area churches that are involved. The campaign officially launches after Labor Day, following a great deal of preparation and promotion.
There are five primary components to the campaign:
1) mass advertising via spiritually oriented questions on billboards, radio, and TV,
2) basic training for church members in asking spiritually oriented questions and learning to listen well,
3) two months of seeker friendly sermons in 330 participating churches addressing basic life questions,
4) two months with thousands of seeker friendly mid-week small discussion groups addressing basic life questions,
5) encouraging church members to seek out opportunities to ask basic life questions where they live, work, and play with those willing to engage in these kinds of conversations.
In the gospels we see evangelism taking two basic forms: “come and see” and “go and tell”. Both are Biblical, but the great commission and the epistles focus on “go and tell”. Another more contemporary label for “go and tell” is ”missional living”. It involves living incarnationally among the lost, demonstrating and proclaiming Christ in relevant ways to them.
It appears to me that components two and five of the Explore God campaign are the components that best represent missional living, with component four also containing some missional elements. The greatest challenge and the greatest measure of success with this, and any evangelism campaign, is what happens after the campaign is over?
It would be wonderful if tens of thousands of seekers in our city hear and understand the gospel as a result of this campaign. Perhaps resulting in several thousand coming into a saving relationship with Christ. But that is aiming too low.
There are two other things that would thrill me far more.
1) GOOD FOLLOW-UP OF CONVERTS. Will these new converts receive initial follow-up in a timely manner? Will they be incorporated as long-term members into Austin area churches? Will they receive and respond well to quality discipleship training? Sadly most outreach campaigns devote little attention to these issues.
2) EMBRACING A MISSIONAL LIFESTYLE. Will the Christian participants in this campaign be permanently changed as a result? If not, we may need Explore God 2 next year and the Return of Explore God the following year, and Explore God the Sequel the year after that. An endless stream of high profile, resource intensive, evangelism campaigns in which to involve our congregations so that they will, for a brief period of time, engage the lost.
My home church conducted a survey of its members and attenders earlier this year. The survey asked many dozens of questions regarding a spectrum of important issues. One of the findings of the survey was that most of our members and attenders NEVER or RARELY share their faith. This is in a church that promotes outreach very aggressively from the pulpit and with its programs.
Will this campaign help turn this around? I hope and pray it does. Will members and attenders at my home church and the other 330 churches in the city start to more regularly and more effectively share the gospel where they live, work, and play? Time will tell.
Evangelism is a tough area of obedience for most believers. To be honest, it is a tough area of obedience for me.
How do Christians develop deep personal convictions that translate into how they live their daily lives? Convictions regarding the reality of heaven and hell. Regarding the hopelessness and eternal destiny of the lost. Regarding their personal responsibility to demonstrate and proclaim the gospel. Regarding their responsibility to take the gospel to every people group on the planet. That is the million dollar question. I would love to hear your thoughts.
There are five primary components to the campaign:
1) mass advertising via spiritually oriented questions on billboards, radio, and TV,
2) basic training for church members in asking spiritually oriented questions and learning to listen well,
3) two months of seeker friendly sermons in 330 participating churches addressing basic life questions,
4) two months with thousands of seeker friendly mid-week small discussion groups addressing basic life questions,
5) encouraging church members to seek out opportunities to ask basic life questions where they live, work, and play with those willing to engage in these kinds of conversations.
In the gospels we see evangelism taking two basic forms: “come and see” and “go and tell”. Both are Biblical, but the great commission and the epistles focus on “go and tell”. Another more contemporary label for “go and tell” is ”missional living”. It involves living incarnationally among the lost, demonstrating and proclaiming Christ in relevant ways to them.
It appears to me that components two and five of the Explore God campaign are the components that best represent missional living, with component four also containing some missional elements. The greatest challenge and the greatest measure of success with this, and any evangelism campaign, is what happens after the campaign is over?
It would be wonderful if tens of thousands of seekers in our city hear and understand the gospel as a result of this campaign. Perhaps resulting in several thousand coming into a saving relationship with Christ. But that is aiming too low.
There are two other things that would thrill me far more.
1) GOOD FOLLOW-UP OF CONVERTS. Will these new converts receive initial follow-up in a timely manner? Will they be incorporated as long-term members into Austin area churches? Will they receive and respond well to quality discipleship training? Sadly most outreach campaigns devote little attention to these issues.
2) EMBRACING A MISSIONAL LIFESTYLE. Will the Christian participants in this campaign be permanently changed as a result? If not, we may need Explore God 2 next year and the Return of Explore God the following year, and Explore God the Sequel the year after that. An endless stream of high profile, resource intensive, evangelism campaigns in which to involve our congregations so that they will, for a brief period of time, engage the lost.
My home church conducted a survey of its members and attenders earlier this year. The survey asked many dozens of questions regarding a spectrum of important issues. One of the findings of the survey was that most of our members and attenders NEVER or RARELY share their faith. This is in a church that promotes outreach very aggressively from the pulpit and with its programs.
Will this campaign help turn this around? I hope and pray it does. Will members and attenders at my home church and the other 330 churches in the city start to more regularly and more effectively share the gospel where they live, work, and play? Time will tell.
Evangelism is a tough area of obedience for most believers. To be honest, it is a tough area of obedience for me.
How do Christians develop deep personal convictions that translate into how they live their daily lives? Convictions regarding the reality of heaven and hell. Regarding the hopelessness and eternal destiny of the lost. Regarding their personal responsibility to demonstrate and proclaim the gospel. Regarding their responsibility to take the gospel to every people group on the planet. That is the million dollar question. I would love to hear your thoughts.
Sunday, August 4, 2013
from August 4, 2013 prayer udpate
Remember worlds A, B, and C from last month’s reflections? World A is unreached (less than 2% evangelical Christian), world B is underreached (2-5% evangelical Christian), world C is reached (more than 5% evangelical Christian).
With the U.S. being 29% evangelical Christian it lies solidly in world C. But not entirely. We need to make an effort to stop thinking about missions primarily from a geographic standpoint and start thinking about it from a people group standpoint.
Within world A is an important subgroup of unreached peoples called UUPGs (unengaged unreached people groups). It is the opinion of many missiologists that these people should be the top priority of churches and missions sending organizations seeking to be strategic in their great commission contribution. UUPGs have been defined as a people group where there is no church planting methodology consistent with evangelical faith and practice under way. Although these groups are found primarily in the 10-40 window, immigrants and refugees from these people groups can be found in many places around the world. Including in the U.S.
A statement I use frequently when I teach Perspectives classes is “God has not called the Church to simply engage in the great commission, He has called the Church to complete the great commission.” If this is true, the priority of UPGs and UUPGs is self evident.
According to a recent article by J.D. Payne, there are currently 3041 UUPGs globally. 106 of these UUPGs have representatives living in the U.S. Payne references stats from an April 2013 report titled “Global Status of Evangelical Christianity” published by Global Research with the International Mission Board. God is bringing the nations, including the unreached and the unengaged to our doorstep.
What are the implications of this for the Church of Jesus Christ? Let me suggest four.
First, we should view God bringing the nations to our doorstep as a stewardship issue. When we think about reaching our communities with the gospel, we need to place a priority on reaching international students, immigrants, and refugees. Especially those coming from UPGs and UUPGs. Strategic engagement should be an important component our involvement with the lost.
Second, we can seize these God-given opportunities to provide meaningful cross-cultural experiences for our congregations. Short-term mission trips should not be the only tool in our toolbox for giving members of our congregation cross-cultural exposure.
Third, the presence of representatives from particular UPGs and UUPGs in our community should be a factor in shaping the focus areas we select for our church’s international missions efforts. When local and global efforts can be married it has a synergistic effect and brings greater impact to both.
Fourth, engagement with local UPGs and UUPGs provides wonderful cross-cultural internships for individuals preparing to engage with UPGs and UUPGs long-term overseas. This should be a key component of sending church’s missionary candidacy process for training new workers.
With the U.S. being 29% evangelical Christian it lies solidly in world C. But not entirely. We need to make an effort to stop thinking about missions primarily from a geographic standpoint and start thinking about it from a people group standpoint.
Within world A is an important subgroup of unreached peoples called UUPGs (unengaged unreached people groups). It is the opinion of many missiologists that these people should be the top priority of churches and missions sending organizations seeking to be strategic in their great commission contribution. UUPGs have been defined as a people group where there is no church planting methodology consistent with evangelical faith and practice under way. Although these groups are found primarily in the 10-40 window, immigrants and refugees from these people groups can be found in many places around the world. Including in the U.S.
A statement I use frequently when I teach Perspectives classes is “God has not called the Church to simply engage in the great commission, He has called the Church to complete the great commission.” If this is true, the priority of UPGs and UUPGs is self evident.
According to a recent article by J.D. Payne, there are currently 3041 UUPGs globally. 106 of these UUPGs have representatives living in the U.S. Payne references stats from an April 2013 report titled “Global Status of Evangelical Christianity” published by Global Research with the International Mission Board. God is bringing the nations, including the unreached and the unengaged to our doorstep.
What are the implications of this for the Church of Jesus Christ? Let me suggest four.
First, we should view God bringing the nations to our doorstep as a stewardship issue. When we think about reaching our communities with the gospel, we need to place a priority on reaching international students, immigrants, and refugees. Especially those coming from UPGs and UUPGs. Strategic engagement should be an important component our involvement with the lost.
Second, we can seize these God-given opportunities to provide meaningful cross-cultural experiences for our congregations. Short-term mission trips should not be the only tool in our toolbox for giving members of our congregation cross-cultural exposure.
Third, the presence of representatives from particular UPGs and UUPGs in our community should be a factor in shaping the focus areas we select for our church’s international missions efforts. When local and global efforts can be married it has a synergistic effect and brings greater impact to both.
Fourth, engagement with local UPGs and UUPGs provides wonderful cross-cultural internships for individuals preparing to engage with UPGs and UUPGs long-term overseas. This should be a key component of sending church’s missionary candidacy process for training new workers.
Sunday, July 7, 2013
from July 7, 2013 prayer update
Missiologists have divided the world into three easy to understand categories -- worlds A, B, and C.
World C is 5% plus evangelical Christian. It is reached. It does not mean there is no need for evangelism in world C, there is still a great need. But world C can be won to Christ if the existing Church is obedient to the great commission in taking the gospel, making disciples, and planting churches among its own people. There is no need for outside missionary involvement in world C. In fact, many believe it is poor stewardship of limited manpower resources to continue to send missionaries into world C. The U.S. is 29% evangelical Christian and is solidly in world C. Even its most “unreached” cities are in the mid-teens as a percentage of evangelical Christians. Canada, the Caribbean, most of Latin America, most of sub-Sahara Africa, Australia, and most of China are now world C.
World B is 2% to 5% evangelical Christian. It is underreached. It is the job of the national church in world B to take the gospel, make disciples, and plant churches among its own people. But there is still a place for missionary specialists assisting in support roles (not lead roles) partnering alongside the existing national church. Many believe we should stop sending most (not all) of the missionaries we are currently sending into world B, and let the national church do its job. Much of Europe is world B (sadly with Christianity on the decline, rather than growing).
World A is less than 2% evangelical Christian. 28% of the world’s population live in world A. 2 billion people. It is unreached. These are not people who have rejected the gospel message. These are people who have never heard. They are people groups with little or no access to the life-changing gospel message and a culturally relevant church. World A can only be reached with the involvement of outside missionaries. They lack the manpower to do the job themselves. World A should be the focus of most missions work today. It can be defined geographically. It is an area known as the 10-40 window (composed of north Africa, the Middle East, central/south/east Asia). It is where 97% of the world’s unreached peoples live. Places like India, Indonesia, Japan, and Pakistan.
Sadly only 2.5% of the world’s missionaries work in world A. 17.5% work in world B. A full 80% continue to focus on world C. Why? In part because of inaccurate or incomplete information about the world we live in and the status of missions in the world. But mostly because work among the unreached is hard, slow, and it can be dangerous. The easier work is already well underway.
Within world A is an important subgroup of unreached peoples called UUPGs (unengaged unreached people groups). These people should be the top priority of any church or missions sending organization seeking to be strategic in their great commission contribution. UUPGs have been defined as a people group where there is no church planting methodology consistent with evangelical faith and practice under way. Although these groups are also concentrated in the 10-40 window, immigrants and refugees from these people groups can be found around the world, including the U.S. God is bringing the nations, including the unreached and the unengaged to our doorstep. Next month, I will talk about opportunities to engage with UUPGs here in the U.S.
World C is 5% plus evangelical Christian. It is reached. It does not mean there is no need for evangelism in world C, there is still a great need. But world C can be won to Christ if the existing Church is obedient to the great commission in taking the gospel, making disciples, and planting churches among its own people. There is no need for outside missionary involvement in world C. In fact, many believe it is poor stewardship of limited manpower resources to continue to send missionaries into world C. The U.S. is 29% evangelical Christian and is solidly in world C. Even its most “unreached” cities are in the mid-teens as a percentage of evangelical Christians. Canada, the Caribbean, most of Latin America, most of sub-Sahara Africa, Australia, and most of China are now world C.
World B is 2% to 5% evangelical Christian. It is underreached. It is the job of the national church in world B to take the gospel, make disciples, and plant churches among its own people. But there is still a place for missionary specialists assisting in support roles (not lead roles) partnering alongside the existing national church. Many believe we should stop sending most (not all) of the missionaries we are currently sending into world B, and let the national church do its job. Much of Europe is world B (sadly with Christianity on the decline, rather than growing).
World A is less than 2% evangelical Christian. 28% of the world’s population live in world A. 2 billion people. It is unreached. These are not people who have rejected the gospel message. These are people who have never heard. They are people groups with little or no access to the life-changing gospel message and a culturally relevant church. World A can only be reached with the involvement of outside missionaries. They lack the manpower to do the job themselves. World A should be the focus of most missions work today. It can be defined geographically. It is an area known as the 10-40 window (composed of north Africa, the Middle East, central/south/east Asia). It is where 97% of the world’s unreached peoples live. Places like India, Indonesia, Japan, and Pakistan.
Sadly only 2.5% of the world’s missionaries work in world A. 17.5% work in world B. A full 80% continue to focus on world C. Why? In part because of inaccurate or incomplete information about the world we live in and the status of missions in the world. But mostly because work among the unreached is hard, slow, and it can be dangerous. The easier work is already well underway.
Within world A is an important subgroup of unreached peoples called UUPGs (unengaged unreached people groups). These people should be the top priority of any church or missions sending organization seeking to be strategic in their great commission contribution. UUPGs have been defined as a people group where there is no church planting methodology consistent with evangelical faith and practice under way. Although these groups are also concentrated in the 10-40 window, immigrants and refugees from these people groups can be found around the world, including the U.S. God is bringing the nations, including the unreached and the unengaged to our doorstep. Next month, I will talk about opportunities to engage with UUPGs here in the U.S.
Sunday, June 2, 2013
from June 2, 2013 prayer update
I occasionally receive unsolicited feedback regarding my monthly prayer updates and my quarterly newsletters. I always appreciate that feedback. We sometimes believe that we know how others perceive things, but the reality is we don’t unless they tell us.
Proverbs 15:22 says “Without counsel plans fail, but with many advisers they succeed.”
My team always surveys participants immediately following our church partnership events. Sometimes clear themes emerge, positively or negatively, from the survey. That is what you hope for. It provides an objective basis for how to best move forward. Other times what was a strong positive for one person was a strong negative for another. It is tough to know what do with that feedback.
The unsolicited feedback I have received regarding my monthly prayer updates and my quarterly newsletters has sometimes been conflicting in nature. Nonetheless, I would like to solicit some additional feedback. Actually I am hoping for a lot of feedback.
I would love to hear from you! It doesn’t need to be lengthy or take much time. Although if you would like to wax eloquent, please do. What feedback do you have for me regarding my monthly prayer updates and quarterly newsletters? Positive or negative? Regarding whatever aspect(s) of these communications that you would choose to focus on -- frequency? length? look and feel? content included? content omitted? tone? writing style? prayer points? personal reflections? upcoming events? support update? or anything else that you believe is important? Please be honest. This is not an attempt at soliciting affirmation.
Thanks for taking a few minutes to serve me with this request. I hope to be able to return the favor by providing you with more helpful and relevant communication in the future. Rather than delaying, and perhaps forgetting, would you take a couple of minutes and respond right now? Thanks!
Please know how much you are valued and appreciated. The missions mobilization work I do with U.S. local churches through Pioneers, on behalf of the least reached globally, would not be possible apart from your partnership financially and through prayer. THANK YOU!
Proverbs 15:22 says “Without counsel plans fail, but with many advisers they succeed.”
My team always surveys participants immediately following our church partnership events. Sometimes clear themes emerge, positively or negatively, from the survey. That is what you hope for. It provides an objective basis for how to best move forward. Other times what was a strong positive for one person was a strong negative for another. It is tough to know what do with that feedback.
The unsolicited feedback I have received regarding my monthly prayer updates and my quarterly newsletters has sometimes been conflicting in nature. Nonetheless, I would like to solicit some additional feedback. Actually I am hoping for a lot of feedback.
I would love to hear from you! It doesn’t need to be lengthy or take much time. Although if you would like to wax eloquent, please do. What feedback do you have for me regarding my monthly prayer updates and quarterly newsletters? Positive or negative? Regarding whatever aspect(s) of these communications that you would choose to focus on -- frequency? length? look and feel? content included? content omitted? tone? writing style? prayer points? personal reflections? upcoming events? support update? or anything else that you believe is important? Please be honest. This is not an attempt at soliciting affirmation.
Thanks for taking a few minutes to serve me with this request. I hope to be able to return the favor by providing you with more helpful and relevant communication in the future. Rather than delaying, and perhaps forgetting, would you take a couple of minutes and respond right now? Thanks!
Please know how much you are valued and appreciated. The missions mobilization work I do with U.S. local churches through Pioneers, on behalf of the least reached globally, would not be possible apart from your partnership financially and through prayer. THANK YOU!
Tuesday, May 7, 2013
from May 5, 2013 prayer update
On April 23-25 Pioneers hosted a forum at our U.S. mobilization base in Orlando for 30 church missions leaders from across the country titled “a closer look: disciple making and church planting in hard places”. We were joined by 14 key leaders within Pioneers USA and the 9 members of Pioneers church partnerships team. Jerry Trousdale, author of Miraculous Movements, a captivating book about church planting movements in Muslim Africa, was the primary speaker. Also contributing were Ted Esler (executive VP for Pioneers USA), Yinka Ojo (with Pioneers Africa), and L.D. Waterman (with Pioneers in Indonesia). Our six session topics included:
• Christ-centric foundations for engaging lostness
• Jesus’ counter intuitive disciple making strategies
• counterpoint: potential issues with CPM
• a field perspective: implementing the discovery approach to CPM
• practicing CPM principles in Africa
• principles and practices
The sessions were split between presentations by individual speakers and interactive Q&A sessions with panels. Included were times of worship and intercession for the nations. We shared all our meals together and had time within a busy schedule for formal and informal interaction with each other around what we were hearing.
We were treated to dozens of recent stories of CPM (church planting movements) initiated by unlikely leaders in Muslim contexts. CPM examples that were strikingly different from the programmatic evangelism, disciple making, and church planting undertaken by well trained professionals that is normative in the U.S. and in many other contexts globally. The forum was a welcomed reminder that God delights in using ordinary individuals to accomplish extraordinary things to advance His kingdom.
Below are a few comments from those participating in the forum.
• The openness to discuss CPM from all sides was very helpful. My questions & reservations were graciously addressed.
• Serious willingness to entertain/discuss criticism of the concepts. Bringing that out and letting it be openly discussed was very healthy and informative.
• Increased my respect for your ethos - VERY impressed by the winsome dialog including honest - not 'straw man' consideration of opposing views.
• The forum gave me a better understanding of church planting. I will be more equipped to talk strategy with our missionaries and encourage them.
• I am committing to pray more regularly for UPGs and CPMs and to invite those in my congregation to do the same. I also feel more equipped to engage with and support our own missionaries doing CPM work.
• Loved the networking and chance to chat with like-minded churchmen (and women). Case studies were great.
• The interaction with other church leaders was very encouraging and helpful. Likewise, the humility and openness of the speakers was a blessing.
• I have come to expect high levels of hospitality, spirited debate, and gracious openness from Pioneers. It was on display throughout this conference. Appreciate how PI relates to the local church!
• I was refreshed to have an organization of the size and caliber of Pioneers admit to the very churches that support them that they are working through things and are willing to listen.
• I already had a great amount of respect for Pioneers and this experience increased my respect and clarified my understanding of the organization’s commitments and values.
• I got to know Pioneers better and like them even more than before! The humility and servanthood of Pioneers staff was a beautiful reflection of Christ.
Pioneers readily admits that we are in the early stages of implementing CPM strategies in our work among the unreached. We are learners and experimenters, not experts. We are seeing limited success in some of the places where these strategies have been taught and implemented. And we are discovering the need to tweak and adapt strategies in many of the settings where we serve. But we see great potential for rapid kingdom expansion in hard places as we continue forward with these efforts.
If CPM among unreached peoples is a priority with the works and workers your church partners with, I would be delighted to interact with you or connect you with others within Pioneers. We would welcome discussing how Pioneers may be able to partner with you in your efforts.
• Christ-centric foundations for engaging lostness
• Jesus’ counter intuitive disciple making strategies
• counterpoint: potential issues with CPM
• a field perspective: implementing the discovery approach to CPM
• practicing CPM principles in Africa
• principles and practices
The sessions were split between presentations by individual speakers and interactive Q&A sessions with panels. Included were times of worship and intercession for the nations. We shared all our meals together and had time within a busy schedule for formal and informal interaction with each other around what we were hearing.
We were treated to dozens of recent stories of CPM (church planting movements) initiated by unlikely leaders in Muslim contexts. CPM examples that were strikingly different from the programmatic evangelism, disciple making, and church planting undertaken by well trained professionals that is normative in the U.S. and in many other contexts globally. The forum was a welcomed reminder that God delights in using ordinary individuals to accomplish extraordinary things to advance His kingdom.
Below are a few comments from those participating in the forum.
• The openness to discuss CPM from all sides was very helpful. My questions & reservations were graciously addressed.
• Serious willingness to entertain/discuss criticism of the concepts. Bringing that out and letting it be openly discussed was very healthy and informative.
• Increased my respect for your ethos - VERY impressed by the winsome dialog including honest - not 'straw man' consideration of opposing views.
• The forum gave me a better understanding of church planting. I will be more equipped to talk strategy with our missionaries and encourage them.
• I am committing to pray more regularly for UPGs and CPMs and to invite those in my congregation to do the same. I also feel more equipped to engage with and support our own missionaries doing CPM work.
• Loved the networking and chance to chat with like-minded churchmen (and women). Case studies were great.
• The interaction with other church leaders was very encouraging and helpful. Likewise, the humility and openness of the speakers was a blessing.
• I have come to expect high levels of hospitality, spirited debate, and gracious openness from Pioneers. It was on display throughout this conference. Appreciate how PI relates to the local church!
• I was refreshed to have an organization of the size and caliber of Pioneers admit to the very churches that support them that they are working through things and are willing to listen.
• I already had a great amount of respect for Pioneers and this experience increased my respect and clarified my understanding of the organization’s commitments and values.
• I got to know Pioneers better and like them even more than before! The humility and servanthood of Pioneers staff was a beautiful reflection of Christ.
Pioneers readily admits that we are in the early stages of implementing CPM strategies in our work among the unreached. We are learners and experimenters, not experts. We are seeing limited success in some of the places where these strategies have been taught and implemented. And we are discovering the need to tweak and adapt strategies in many of the settings where we serve. But we see great potential for rapid kingdom expansion in hard places as we continue forward with these efforts.
If CPM among unreached peoples is a priority with the works and workers your church partners with, I would be delighted to interact with you or connect you with others within Pioneers. We would welcome discussing how Pioneers may be able to partner with you in your efforts.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)