from August 4, 2013 prayer udpate

Remember worlds A, B, and C from last month’s reflections? World A is unreached (less than 2% evangelical Christian), world B is underreached (2-5% evangelical Christian), world C is reached (more than 5% evangelical Christian).

With the U.S. being 29% evangelical Christian it lies solidly in world C. But not entirely. We need to make an effort to stop thinking about missions primarily from a geographic standpoint and start thinking about it from a people group standpoint.

Within world A is an important subgroup of unreached peoples called UUPGs (unengaged unreached people groups). It is the opinion of many missiologists that these people should be the top priority of churches and missions sending organizations seeking to be strategic in their great commission contribution. UUPGs have been defined as a people group where there is no church planting methodology consistent with evangelical faith and practice under way. Although these groups are found primarily in the 10-40 window, immigrants and refugees from these people groups can be found in many places around the world. Including in the U.S.

A statement I use frequently when I teach Perspectives classes is “God has not called the Church to simply engage in the great commission, He has called the Church to complete the great commission.” If this is true, the priority of UPGs and UUPGs is self evident.

According to a recent article by J.D. Payne, there are currently 3041 UUPGs globally. 106 of these UUPGs have representatives living in the U.S. Payne references stats from an April 2013 report titled “Global Status of Evangelical Christianity” published by Global Research with the International Mission Board. God is bringing the nations, including the unreached and the unengaged to our doorstep.

What are the implications of this for the Church of Jesus Christ? Let me suggest four.

First, we should view God bringing the nations to our doorstep as a stewardship issue. When we think about reaching our communities with the gospel, we need to place a priority on reaching international students, immigrants, and refugees. Especially those coming from UPGs and UUPGs. Strategic engagement should be an important component our involvement with the lost.

Second, we can seize these God-given opportunities to provide meaningful cross-cultural experiences for our congregations. Short-term mission trips should not be the only tool in our toolbox for giving members of our congregation cross-cultural exposure.

Third, the presence of representatives from particular UPGs and UUPGs in our community should be a factor in shaping the focus areas we select for our church’s international missions efforts. When local and global efforts can be married it has a synergistic effect and brings greater impact to both.

Fourth, engagement with local UPGs and UUPGs provides wonderful cross-cultural internships for individuals preparing to engage with UPGs and UUPGs long-term overseas. This should be a key component of sending church’s missionary candidacy process for training new workers.